History

Since the early 20th century,
fisheries in the Chehalis Basin have been a cornerstone of the
economic foundation of the region. During the 1970's and early 1980's
Washington's
coastal fishing industry faced an intense economic and political storm while
being torn
between environmental and economic needs. Due to the over-harvesting, dams,
habitat destruction, large-scale interception of Pacific Northwest Coho and Chinook
salmon and offshore driftnets, populations of salmon and Steelhead from the Chehalis
drainage system have been all but decimated.
In January of 1980, the Port of
Grays Harbor recognized the need for greater cooperation among fishery user groups. They requested the Grays Harbor Regional Planning
Commission explore the establishment of a task force to evaluate anadromous
resources within the Grays Harbor watershed and recommend enhancement strategies.
The coalition envisioned by the
Port was to be an alliance of appropriate federal agencies, state departments of Fisheries and Wildlife, local municipalities, public and
private
industries, tribal councils and commercial and sport fishing groups. They were
mandated with the goal of increasing salmonid fish runs. It was believed that a united
effort by affected groups and agencies could effect a solution. With this request, the Grays Harbor Fisheries Enhancement Task Force
(GHFETF) was established in February 1980.
During that first year an action
plan was prepared. An initial $25,000 was appropriated by the Port of Grays Harbor to fund fisheries enhancement projects. Grays Harbor
Regional Planning assisted in the implementation of the plan by acting as the lead
agency, referral source and monitor of fisheries enhancement issues. In 1982 the Commission
published a status report of completed and proposed projects.
To administer funding requests and
allocations regarding the balance of the original
$25,000, the Port asked the Commission to reconvene the Task Force in early 1984
with the intent of disbanding the Task Force after the monies were allocated. However, due to the general consensus of the participants and the success achieved during its
first four
years of operation, the Task Force remained intact serving as a catalyst for
continued
coordination.
Salmon enhancement by volunteers
was gaining momentum. In 1984, the Port of Grays
Harbor allocated an additional $25,000 to enhancement efforts. By the end of
that year funds were exhausted. By 1989 subsequent grants annually approved by the Port
totaled $150,000. Matching amounts of volunteer labor, donated materials, equipment and
money had exceeded $1.25 million (nearly a 10:1 community match).
The Task Force has sponsored over a
dozen new projects since 1984. Numerous projects
initiated prior to 1984 are still operating. Several earlier enhancement
undertakings (e.g., the Satsop and Humptulips late native Steelhead projects) were terminated as
natural fish returns had reached desired levels.
With these enhancements projects
well established, the Task Force recognized habitat
improvement as a key factor in increasing salmonid populations. Therefore, in
1987 habitat improvement was added to the coalition's mission statement.
In 1990 the Washington State
Legislature created twelve (12) regional enhancement groups modeled after the GHFETF. This legislation expanded Task Force operations
to
encompass all water draining into Grays Harbor; including portions of eight
counties.
The responsibilities of serving an
area of this size proved to be tremendous, as were the
opportunities. To assist with these growing demands, in June of 1990, the
Weyerhaeuser
Corporation granted employee Dave Hamilton a two-year paid leave of absence to
serve as Fisheries Coordinator. This resource allowed the Task Force to upgrade
operations and
administrative structure and expand it's operations throughout the Chehalis
Basin.
As the Task Force grew, it evolved
to meet the changing needs of its members. A new administration and project coordination staff was created. The Board of
Directors was expanded to represent the additional areas being served. The corporate name
was changed to reflect the new boundaries and new and expanded funding sources were sought out.
-TOP
OF PAGE-